Signal
In contrast to swift regime collapses in other contexts, Ukraine’s resistance to Russia’s February 24, 2022 invasion stemmed from deliberate defensive preparations and adaptive air strategy. Russian forces launched extensive missile and air strikes to try to achieve rapid air superiority and paralyse Ukrainian command and control at the outset of the war. However, Ukraine’s air defence and air force elements were dispersed, mobile, and largely avoided destruction on bases; only a minority of mobile air‑defence units were lost in the first 48 hours, despite significant strikes on static sites. This preserved defensive capacity denied Russia control of Ukrainian airspace and prevented airborne troops from securing strategic points like Hostomel Airport through overwhelming air cover. UAF mechanised formations had already moved toward defensive lines, meeting Russian columns hours after the invasion began, showing foresight in deployment and battlefield coordination that contrasted starkly with assumptions of an easily toppled state.
Why it matters / Implications
The decisive difference between a quick collapse and sustained defence is not merely brute force, but preparedness, mobility, and redundancy in critical systems. Russia’s failure to suppress Ukraine’s air defence and aviation early allowed Kyiv to contest control of the skies and protect ground forces. Western analysts note that Russia did not execute a true suppression of enemy air defence (SEAD) campaign with the scale, integration, and precision required to neutralise Ukraine’s dispersed systems, allowing Ukraine to continue operations at low altitude and defend vital infrastructure and forces. The Ukrainian strategy of dispersing air defence assets and repositioning frequently made it hard for Russian forces to identify and target cohesive defensive nodes. This adaptability preserved enough combat capability to slow Russian advances and blunt their shock campaign.
Strategic takeaway
Preparedness wins time. A state that anticipates aggression and moves forces into decentralised, resilient postures before conflict ignition can avoid being paralysed by initial strikes even against a technically superior invader. Ukraine’s experience highlights the importance of integrated air defence mobility, early warning dispersion, and pre‑emptive deployment of units as core tenets of national defence doctrine. Denying an adversary air superiority complicates their ability to insert troops, paralyse defenders, and achieve rapid objectives making prolonged resistance and strategic depth possible.
Investor implications
Defence tech: Air defence systems with mobility, networked sensing, and rapid redeployment gain premium investment value.
Command & control innovation: Decentralised C2 platforms that survive initial strikes enhance resilience.
Redundant logistics: Firms supporting dispersed logistics and resilient supply chains are strategic assets in contested theatres.
ISR analytics: Predictive models and monitoring tools that inform pre‑conflict dispersal decisions are worth capital allocation.
Training & preparedness: Scalable simulation and readiness training platforms that embed dispersion and mobility into doctrine will be in demand.
Watchpoints
2026–2027: NATO and allied air defence exercises incorporating mobility and dispersion strategies.
Mid‑2026: Defence reviews by frontline states (e.g., Baltic, Asian neighbours) adopting Ukrainian lessons on air defence pre‑deployment.
Late‑2026: Development of integrated, low‑observable air defence networks leveraging AI predictive repositioning.
Tactical Lexicon: SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defence)
A military operation aiming to neutralise, destroy, or degrade an enemy’s air defence systems, enabling control of the airspace.
Why it matters:
The side that achieves air superiority shapes the initial tactical tempo and dictates enemy mobility.
Denial of SEAD success preserves defender capability and buys strategic time.
Sources: mwcoe.org
The signal is the high ground. Hold it.
Subscribe for monthly tactical briefings on AI, defence, DePIN, and geostrategy.
thesixthfield.com