Signal
In September 2025, Germany’s Defence Minister, Boris Pistorius, publicly warned that future conflicts “will be fought openly in orbit,” after accusing Russia of actively tracking German military satellites. Russia’s Luch “Olymp” surveillance satellites were said to shadow Intelsat systems used by government actors. Germany announced plans to invest €35 billion by 2030 into space security to ensure both protection and operational effectiveness. The German warning marks a more explicit posture: kinetic risk, signal interference, or proximity operations may be legitimised parts of future conflict. Analysts note that Russia and China have already demonstrated anti‑satellite capabilities or aggressive orbital maneuvers. The comments represent a rhetorical shift for European powers, signaling that they now view space as a militarised frontier, not just a support domain.
Why it matters
The public framing makes contest in space visible, it moves orbital risk from niche to mainstream defence thinking. Germany’s posture signals that Europe’s armed forces must now treat space as an active domain, not passive infrastructure. This recalibrates priorities: satellite resilience, interceptor capabilities, on‑orbit defence, and autonomous space situational awareness become mission‑critical.
It also invites escalation: orbit is crowded, contested, and state actions are harder to hide. Sovereign powers can deploy counterspace measures under the guise of deterrence, blur lines between civilian and military assets, and impose new rules via presence, not just law. Germany’s move may provoke similar declarations elsewhere, pushing space into the visible arena of great‑power competition.
Strategic takeaway
The militarisation of space is no longer future talk. Europe, once dependent on U.S. space guarantees must now build credible orbital deterrence and resilience. Sovereignty in the Sixth Field extends upward: power above the atmosphere is as essential as power on land or sea. Anchor institutions, doctrine, and procurement must expand upward.
Investor implications
Space infrastructure firms (satellite builders, resilient constellations, distributed mesh architectures) may see accelerated capital deployment. Companies like Maxar (NYSE: MAXR), Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC), and Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) may benefit from European demand surfacing. Attitude shifts favor anti‑jamming, anti-kinetic shielding, redundant navigation systems, and resilient communications pushing growth in satellite cybersecurity, distributed LEO constellations, and orbital servicing.
New or existing space ETFs, such as ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) or Procure Space ETF (UFO), may gain exposure from increased defence allocations to space. Defence primes like Airbus Defence & Space, Thales Alenia, and emerging smallsat firms may garner new contracts. Insurance, risk analytics, and on-orbit monitoring startups become strategic infrastructure: firms that can detect, attribute, and defend against proximity attacks gain asymmetric relevance.
Watchpoints
2026 → Germany’s first public operational upgrades in satellite resilience or interceptor capability
2027 → France, UK, and EU-wide space defence doctrine updates or funding announcements
Any orbital incident (collision, satellite disablement) involving European or NATO assets signals escalation
Tactical Lexicon: Orbital Sovereignty
Control, defence, and regulation of space assets as a domain of sovereign contest.
Why it matters: Sovereignty no longer stops at atmosphere it extends into orbit.
Relevance: Satellite networks, communications, intelligence, and positioning all become vectors in warfare.
Source: independent.co.uk
The signal is the high ground. Hold it.
Subscribe for monthly tactical briefings on AI, defence, DePIN, and geostrategy.
thesixthfield.com