Signal
Japan routes 99 percent of its digital traffic through subsea cables, anchored by more than 20 international landing stations linking North America, Asia, and beyond. In 2022, then, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida allocated $440 million to expand landing points along the Pacific coast and build rural data centres to boost regional economies. In April 2025, the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) designated subsea cables as critical to economic security, signalling a push for domestic production and installation capacity. Yet Japan’s resilience remains constrained: its repair fleet is small, NEC lacks cable-laying vessels, and foreign ships, often Chinese, are critical for maintenance. Between 2019 and 2023, Chinese firms supplied 18 percent of new subsea cables worldwide. In February 2025, Taiwanese authorities charged a Chinese ship captain for cutting a cable off Taiwan’s coast, underscoring how maritime “accidents” can mask deliberate disruption.
Implications
As a transpacific hub, Japan’s subsea cables are a strategic flashpoint in any Sino-U.S. confrontation. Dependence on Chinese repair ships creates a resilience gap, worsened by slow permitting regimes and resistance from fishing unions worried about marine disruption. Shipbuilding expertise and partnerships with the Quad (U.S., Australia, India) offer options, especially if aligned with U.S. shipyard revitalisation under the SHIPS for America Act. Yet without diversified routes and hardened landing stations, Japan risks a single point of failure. A targeted cut, accidental or deliberate, could disrupt global communications, shaking economic stability and eroding sovereignty.
Strategic takeaway
Control of subsea cables is control of digital presence. Japan must diversify routes, expand shipbuilding capacity, and deepen trusted partnerships to defend its sovereignty from seabed vulnerabilities.
Investor Implications
Japanese firms like NEC Corp (TYO: 6701), a global leader in subsea cable manufacturing, are pivotal but constrained by lack of vessel capacity. Allied suppliers such as Alcatel Submarine Networks (Nokia, HEL: NOKIA) and Prysmian Group (BIT: PRY) may gain market share as Japan diversifies. Kawasaki Heavy Industries (TYO: 7012) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (TYO: 7011) could see opportunities if shipbuilding expands into cable layers and repair fleets. Telecom operators like NTT (TYO: 9432) and KDDI (TYO: 9433), both heavy investors in undersea infrastructure, remain exposed to repair and resilience gaps. Investors should track Quad-linked initiatives that reallocate capital toward non-Chinese maintenance capacity.
Watchpoints
May 2025 → U.S. Congress vote on SHIPS for America Act, opening scope for U.S.–Japan shipbuilding.
Oct 2025 → EU–Japan Digital Partnership Council follow-up on submarine cable security and resilience.
2026 → Quad infrastructure initiatives to expand Indo-Pacific cable resilience.
Tactical Lexicon - Cable Corridor
A designated maritime zone where multiple subsea cables are laid together.
Why it matters: simplifies permitting and reduces friction with fishing unions.
But: concentrates cables into a single chokepoint for sabotage or natural disaster.
Japan's Subsea Cable Dilemma - A chokepoint between resilience and sabotage
Source: csis.org
The signal is the high ground. Hold it.
Subscribe for monthly tactical briefings on AI, defence, DePIN, and geostrategy.
thesixthfield.com