Signal
In 2023, the world’s ten largest lithium mines produced over 675,000 tonnes of lithium, with operations concentrated in Australia, Chile, China, and Argentina. Five of the top six sites are in Western Australia, including Greenbushes and Wodgina, both controlled by Albemarle. Chile’s Salar de Atacama fields contribute significant volumes via brine extraction, operated by SQM and Albemarle. Chinese interests dominate the Chaerhan Lake and Jiajika mines. Only a handful of companies, Albemarle, SQM, Pilbara Minerals, Tianqi, and Ganfeng, control the global flow of raw lithium. Projected mine closures range out to 2062, anchoring the future of energy systems in long-term geological leases.
Why it matters
Every lithium ion battery, from iPhones to fighter jets to grid storage, starts at one of these mines. Yet the global supply chain depends on a small number of assets, often located in regions exposed to geopolitical pressure or resource nationalism. Control of these nodes shapes not just EV production, but energy security, military logistics, and strategic autonomy. As processing and cell manufacturing localise, upstream mining remains the chokepoint. Sovereignty in the energy transition demands ownership or assured access to these core sites, not just incentives for battery plants.
Strategic Takeaway
Geological depth equals strategic depth. Sovereignty in energy storage begins at the mine face.
Investor Implications
Control over upstream lithium assets remains the clearest moat in the battery value chain. Equity stakes in mine operators (e.g. Albemarle: NYSE ALB, SQM: NYSE SQM) offer long-horizon exposure to strategic materials. Nations and firms without secure lithium supply risk systemic dependence, especially as EV mandates tighten. Expect increased state-backed bids, offtake agreements, and joint ventures as energy security reframes lithium as a sovereign asset. Investors should track who controls rights, not just refineries.
Watchpoints
2026 → U.S. DPA-backed lithium projects: monitor funding and timelines for domestic mines.
2025–30 → Chile and Argentina lithium policy shifts: resource nationalism vs. global integration.
Ongoing → Chinese firms expanding equity stakes in South American and African lithium plays.
Tactical Lexicon: Strategic Depth
The endurance and flexibility provided by control over long-term resource, industrial, or geographic capacity.
Why it matters:
Enables sovereign continuity during supply shocks or conflict.
Determines leverage in global industrial competition.
Sources: mining-technology.com
The signal is the high ground. Hold it.
Subscribe for monthly tactical briefings on AI, defence, DePIN, and geostrategy.
thesixthfield.com