Signal
In January 2026, the United States arrested Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro using extraterritorial military force. European commentators decried the act as a breach of the “rules-based international order.” But a closer look reveals the phrase itself is aspirational at best, and illusory at worst. Among the UN Security Council’s five permanent members, only the UK and France maintain consistent adherence to this so-called order. The US, Russia, and China violate it routinely, through unsanctioned military interventions, unlawful maritime claims, and institutional manipulation. What is new is not the violations, but the lack of shame. Normative language persists in Western rhetoric, but actions increasingly operate on the basis of power alone.
Why it matters
Europe’s dependence on norms rather than instruments of hard power leaves it strategically exposed. The realpolitik of great powers is no longer hidden behind multilateral gestures. Rules discipline the weak but barely constrain the strong. In this world, states must either possess enforceable power or accept irrelevance. This reality confronts Europe with a doctrine-level challenge: does it have the will and capacity to act, or merely to protest? Without strategic force, Europe’s norms are toast-worthy ideals, elegant but unenforced.
Strategic takeaway
The era of polite fictions is over. Europe must shift from rhetorical norm defence to sovereign power projection, or risk being sidelined in a world ruled by capability, not credibility.
Investor Implications
This shift reshapes the investment logic behind defence, tech, and sovereignty infrastructure. Expect rising European defence budgets, with tailwinds for firms enabling autonomous deterrence and force projection: Airbus Defence (EPA: AIR), Rheinmetall (ETR: RHM), and Saab (STO: SAAB-B). Norm-driven policy risk will erode as realpolitik defines global relations. Investors should favour companies aligned with hard power utilities, energy security, border tech, military-industrial capacity. Civil-norm advocacy platforms may see declining influence in this power-forward era.
Watchpoints
February 2026 → EU Defence Ministers’ meeting on strategic autonomy planning, Brussels.
April 2026 → NATO Summit in Washington: test of alliance cohesion under shifting power norms.
Mid 2026 → Review of European Peace Facility funding: indicator of commitment to hard power projection.
Tactical Lexicon: Rules-Based International Order
An aspirational framework of international law and multilateral norms, invoked most often by middle powers.
Why it matters:
Constrains minor powers more than major ones.
Functions more as diplomatic rhetoric than enforceable law.
Sources: thesixthfield.com
The signal is the high ground. Hold it.
Subscribe for monthly tactical briefings on AI, defence, DePIN, and geostrategy.
thesixthfield.com